Re: [StrongED] RFC; Changing the choices system

[Chris Newman <cvjazz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

In article <522f605254.fjgraute@xxxxxxxxx>, Fred Graute <fjgraute@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> In message <545211c92fcvjazz@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Chris Newman
>           <cvjazz@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >
> > > It's always a good idea to raise any such issues here so that they can
> > > be explained. It will also let me know about areas that can be
> > > improved, be that by clarification in the manual or changing StrongED's
> > > behaviour.
> >
> > Don't know if you've ever used Powerbase, a shareware database for RISCOS

> Yes, I've used but it was a long time ago.

> > but in the iconbar "Preferences" there is the opportunity to save the
> > settings in 1. the programme, 2.the database which is open at that moment
> > or 3. for a particular user. ie you can define at which level at which
> > your settings are implemented. Is that too complex a schema for all the
> > different parameters available in StrongEd?

> Actually my initial proposal is more complicated than the Powerbase model,
> so the answer would be 'No'. :-)

I suspected that.

> The program level is similar to all modes, and database level is either
> mode or text level. User level isn't suitable for StrongED, better to have
> that at OS level.

Quite so. I wasn't very clear. I didn't me exactly the same; I meant
something along similar lines.

-- 
Chris

--
To unsubscribe send a mail to StrongED+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List archives at http://www.Torrens.org.uk/RO/StrongED/index.html