[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[StrongED] Re: spurious threads on this list starting with "Re:"

To: StrongEd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [StrongED] Re: spurious threads on this list starting with "Re:"
From: "Richard Torrens (lists)" <Lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:04:39 +0100
Envelope-to: StrongEd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <5ba8728552.jim@nails.abbeypress.net>
List-id: RISC OS StrongED mailing list
References: <64c18c8452.jim@nails.abbeypress.net> <5284f76eafListmaster@Torrens.org.uk> <52851e8693tim@timil.com> <5ba8728552.jim@nails.abbeypress.net>
Reply-to: StrongED@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Pluto/3.04e (RISC-OS/4.39)

In article <5ba8728552.jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
   Jim Nagel <stred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Come to think of it, do we need the "[StrongED]" prefix at all?
> The mailinglist software does provide a "List-ID" header.

This prefix is not the cause of the problem!

-- 
Richard Torrens.
http://www.Torrens.org.uk for genealogy, natural history, wild food, walks, cats
and more!

-- 
To unsubscribe send a mail to StrongED+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- [StrongED] spurious threads on this list starting with "Re:"
  - From: Jim Nagel
- [StrongED] Re: spurious threads on this list starting with "Re:"
  - From: Richard Torrens (ListMaster)
- [StrongED] Re: spurious threads on this list starting with "Re:"
  - From: Tim Hill
- Re: [StrongED] Re: spurious threads on this list starting with "Re:"
  - From: Jim Nagel

Prev by Date: [StrongED] Re: spurious threads on this list starting with "Re:"
Next by Date: [StrongED] Testing visible newlines
Previous by thread: [StrongED] Re: spurious threads on this list starting with "Re:"
Next by thread: [StrongED] Testing visible newlines
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread